Peer Review Process For Conferences

IMCPS Peer Review Process for Conferences

IMCPS Conference Peer Review Process

 International Medical Conference Proceedings Services(IMCPS) conferences have a rigorous peer-review process and strict assessment criteria for the selection of abstracts. The process is managed by the Joint  Events Programme Committee (JEPC) and involves an international panel of expert reviewers to ensure high scientific quality and relevance. 

 

I 

IMCPS Conference Peer Review Process 

 

International Medical Conference Proceedings Services(IMCPS) conferences have a rigorous peer-review process and strict assessment criteria for the selection of abstracts. The process is managed by the Joint Events Programme Committee (JEPC) and involves an international panel of expert reviewers to ensure high scientific quality and relevance. 

Review and Selection Process

Reviewer Assignment: All submitted abstracts are assigned to reviewers who are experts in the specific topic. A minimum number of reviews (at least four in some cases) are required for a given topic to guarantee a well-rounded and extensive evaluation.

Scoring System: Reviewers use a scoring system (e.g., on a scale of 1 to 8) to evaluate abstracts based on specific criteria.

Coordination and Discussion: A coordinating reviewer is responsible for identifying discrepancies in scoring and organizing discussions among reviewers. Zoom Meetings are held to review scores and select abstracts for the program.

Final Decision: The final selection and allocation (e.g., for oral presentation, poster presentation) are made by the JEPC and its Advisory Board during a dedicated meeting.

Confidentiality and Originality: Submissions are expected to be original scientific material, unpublished at the time of submission (with specific exceptions for certain international meetings or updated analyses with significant new data). 

Assessment Criteria

Abstracts are evaluated and scored primarily on their scientific merits, which include: 

Significance and Impact: The potential importance of the research findings.

Novelty and Originality: The extent to which the work presents new and unique insights.

Appropriateness of Methods: The soundness of the research design and methodology.

Quality of Data: Abstracts must include primary new data (except for "Trials in Progress" abstracts).

Adherence to Guidelines: Abstracts must follow specific submission guidelines regarding structure (e.g., Introduction, Objectives, Methods, Results, Conclusion), character limits, and image specifications. 

This robust process ensures that the SMC conferences present high-quality, valid, and significant research to the international medical and healthcare community. 

IMCPS Joint Events Committee

May 1978, updated in May 2008. 

For more information, please contact: info@imcps.org   

 

©Copyright. All rights reserved. International Medical Conference Proceedings Services(IMCPS), 2000 to 2026

Information icon

We need your consent to load the translations

We use a third-party service to translate the website content that may collect data about your activity. Please review the details in the privacy policy and accept the service to view the translations.